Posted by jlfeldhaus on 23rd April 2008
I chose the historical marker group because, for me, it was the project that had the clearest vision for a beginning, middle, and end. I knew right away what I was getting myself into, maybe not how much work I was going to have to do, but I knew at least what I would be doing. I do not regret my decision at all. I learned so much from this project, not only more about Fredericksburg than I ever cared to know, but how to present that information in a way that anyone could read it on the web and understand its significance.
Honestly, I did not meet all of the deadlines that our group contract specified as far as research, nor was I the only one. In the beginning, it was hard for all of us to judge exactly how long the research aspect of the project was going to take, and for my part, I did underestimate how much time it was going to take to get everything suitable to put onto the website. That being said, I did complete all of my research on the twelve markers assigned to me in enough time as to not effect the members of the group that were assigned to edit the contents and bibliographies of those pages. My late marker posts did not set back work that was to be completed by other members of the group. Though I did not make every deadline, I made sure my group members were aware of why I did not make the deadline, and I also informed them when things were going to be posted.
Early on, we decided that myself and one other group member would handle more of the technology because we were more comfortable with that aspect. I started by making the image header for the website. Later, I formatted the text on the welcome page, added links to it, and broke parts of it into the separate ‘acknowledgments page’, and ‘other digital history projects’ pages to make it look less like a research paper and more like a website. I added, formatted, and organized the categories found on the left side bar and figured out how to make the search bar work for only our site contents. I also added links to the timeline and formatted the ‘About us’ page and edited the photo of us on that page.
As a group we did have problems with different work ethics and some group members did contribute more to the overall project than others. Other than that, I feel like the majority of us were good at communicating with each other. We had frequent email relays when there were problems or questions, and all of us were willing to have group meetings, sometimes once a week, in order to get things accomplished.
I’m extremely proud of our group as a whole and I think it turned out better than I ever expected. We put a lot of work into this project and I think that it really shows when anyone looks at our website.
Posted in Digital History | Comments Off on Reflection
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 21st April 2008
So I’m officially at the point where I just need to back away and let it go. If I don’t, I’ll be making changes to the site and my marker posts all night. I’m so proud of my group and our site.
By the way, I wish I could post our groups string of emails just from today. I think I have one thread that’s 9 or 10 emails long. I’m curious about how other groups are doing as far as finishing up for tomorrow. Maybe I really don’t want to know.
It has been a very long semester.
Posted in Digital History | Comments Off on Done?
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 16th April 2008
- Why our project is significant/what we’ve done with the markers (Amy-first 3, Whitney- last 2)
- What Digital history was about
- Our objective with this project
- Format- online presentation of the markers
- Only site/book that provides categorization and further research on each of the markers
- Provide those interested with more places to look for information
- What the markers actually are (who/what) (Elle)
- explain who puts them up- Department of historic resources
- organization of our website (Shannon-first 4, Jennifer-last 3)
- navigation- organization of categories/tags/tag cloud
- links-who we are linking to and (pull up pages that link to us)
- show about us page
- research- 70 markers, each of us researched form 10-15 markers
- photos- where we got them, some are common pictures found on websites, and some where actually taken by Amy and Elle. They went to several sites and took pictures.
- further reference- interested in finding out more about the subjects or anything related you can use these resources
- show marker pages/sample page (all)
- each person shows an example of their best page,
- explanation includes brief discussion of
Posted in Digital History | Comments Off on Marker: presentation outline for creativity day
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 24th March 2008
I was really impressed with the video “Google Developers Day US – Theorizing from Data” We’ve all had problems finding information with Google. Part of this is simply because the average person doesn’t know all of the techniques that were talked about towards the beginning of the video. I certainly didn’t, and I consider myself pretty comfortable with computers. While I found it helpful and I got the general gist of it, I also felt kind of dumb while watching it. I had to rewind a few parts because I was sitting there going “huh?”. I realized that there’s just so much that you don’t know about finding information.
Towards the end someone asked the question: How do you measure the difference between finding something and how satisfied people were with the results that they found. This is really interesting to me because it really is hard to measure, and if you can’t measure it how can you improve it?
“The main thing that we learned is that people only give feedback when they’re upset”
I laughed at this because it’s so true.
Posted in Digital History, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Google Developers Day US – Theorizing from Data
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 18th February 2008
I have to write a couple of lessons that deal with Jamestown and the Powhatan Indians for an elementary education class I’m taking. So I figured some related wikipedia pages would be fun to look through. for this post.
The page on the history of Virginia is actually pretty good as far as I can tell. It’s very detailed and sites specific sources. Under the discussion tab, I like idea of being able to rate the pages and discuss what could be added. There were only a few things under the discussion tab for the history of Virginia page. Most changes people wanted to see were pretty minor. The page on the Powhatan people is also fairly good.
Wikipedia is useful for things like finding initial sources, or learning a little about a topic before diving into it. It’s just important to remember that it is put together by people that aren’t necessarily scholars on the subject. As long as you look at it critically, I really don’t see a huge problem with it. ♥
Posted in Digital History, Uncategorized | Comments Off on wikipedia history pages
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 30th January 2008
I’m in the historical markers project, and we’re interested in making an interactive map type thing. This tool might be interesting: http://www.pushpin.com/index.html It appears to let you create a map, and put markers on it, though there may be some cost involved. (I may add to this post, since I realized that it probably isn’t due till Sat.) ♥
Posted in Digital History | Comments Off on this one might be interesting…
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 30th January 2008
I use most of the tools that were presented to us in class on Tuesday. There was some discussion of file conversion sites like zamzar.com, and I just want to add that zamzar.com takes a really long time to download files, and sometimes they stop and you have to start them again. I’ve had some luck with converting audio files, but it’s not so great for video files.
It’s really obvious once you get on these sites, but for anyone that doesn’t know, most of these conversion sites give you a taste of the service for free, then prod you into buying the full membership with the added benefits, like faster download speeds and no ads etc. There are a ton of these sites, with some that are obviously better than others.
One that I use all the time is called media convert I use it a lot for converting youtube videos to ipod format, both through video (mp4) and audio (mp3).
I have used flickr.com before, but for uploading my own pictures/files I use photobucket.com, mostly just because of personal preference. Just like the conversion sites, there are a ton of these as well.
I guess as far as tools, I would love to learn more about making mash-up movies, or maybe find other sites that aren’t as restrictive as the propaganda movie making site he showed us. I haven’t really ever played around with any movie making sites or programs. ♥
Posted in Digital History | 2 Comments »
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 27th January 2008
So apparently I already fail at doing these things on time.
I love using del.icio.us as sort of a search engine. If you use a common tag that everyone else has, you can search through everyone else’s bookmarks and see what is popular. This is useful because the popular tags often are what everyone else has found most relevant or useful. So, really you’re using other people as a sort of filtering search engine.
You can combine a popular tag on del.icio.us with an RSS feed to get a quick update of what other people are bookmarking. I’ve used this a couple of times.
I’ve never used google docs before, but it’s turning out to be a good tool for our project on Historical Markers. We set up a doc to get all of our categories organized for the different markers. Everyone in the group can edit the document and see what everyone else is contributing without having to email each other back and forth. I can see how google docs may be an important resource for me as a future teacher.
Posted in Digital History | 2 Comments »
Posted by jlfeldhaus on 20th January 2008
Hey guys. I’m Jennifer and this is my last semester as an undergrad at Mary Washington, though it’s weird for me to say that because it hasn’t really hit me yet that I’m actually graduating. I think part of that is because I’ll be here next year too while I complete my master’s degree in Education before I start teaching elementary school the following year.
I’m taking this class for a couple of reasons. First, because I love the idea of mixing history and technology. Those two words almost seem like oxymorons to me, so figuring out how they’re going to fit together is going to be interesting. I also like the alternative approach to this class, we aren’t going to be
skimming reading a book a week and pretending to pay attention to class discussion. I like that I won’t be bored out of my mind in this class.
The other reason is because I’ve enjoyed all of the classes I’ve taken with Dr. McClurken so far, so I’ll assume that this one isn’t going to suck either. 🙂
I like to think I’m pretty comfortable with computers and technology, and what I don’t know I’m willing to learn. So it’s not really the technology aspect that’s scary to me. I’m more worried about what’s going to be expected of me and the amount of work this class is going to require.
Anyway, I guess that’s it for now. ♥
Posted in Digital History | Comments Off on introduction